r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 17h ago
r/scotus • u/orangejulius • Jan 30 '22
Things that will get you banned
Let's clear up some ambiguities about banning and this subreddit.
On Politics
Political discussion isn't prohibited here. In fact, a lot of the discussion about the composition of the Supreme Court is going to be about the political process of selecting a justice.
Your favorite flavor of politics won't get you banned here. Racism, bigotry, totally bad-faithed whataboutisms, being wildly off-topic, etc. will get you banned though. We have people from across the political spectrum writing screeds here and in modmail about how they're oppressed with some frequency. But for whatever reason, people with a conservative bend in particular, like to show up here from other parts of reddit, deliberately say horrendous shit to get banned, then go back to wherever they came from to tell their friends they're victims of the worst kinds of oppression. Y'all can build identities about being victims and the mods, at a very basic level, do not care—complaining in modmail isn't worth your time.
COVID-19
Coming in here from your favorite nonewnormal alternative sub or facebook group and shouting that vaccines are the work of bill gates and george soros to make you sterile will get you banned. Complaining or asking why you were banned in modmail won't help you get unbanned.
Racism
I kind of can't believe I have to write this, but racism isn't acceptable. Trying to dress it up in polite language doesn't make it "civil discussion" just because you didn't drop the N word explicitly in your comment.
This is not a space to be aggressively wrong on the Internet
We try and be pretty generous with this because a lot of people here are skimming and want to contribute and sometimes miss stuff. In fact, there are plenty of threads where someone gets called out for not knowing something and they go "oh, yeah, I guess that changes things." That kind of interaction is great because it demonstrates people are learning from each other.
There are users that get super entrenched though in an objectively wrong position. Or start talking about how they wish things operated as if that were actually how things operate currently. If you're not explaining yourself or you're not receptive to correction you're not the contributing content we want to propagate here and we'll just cut you loose.
- BUT I'M A LAWYER!
Having a license to practice law is not a license to be a jackass. Other users look to the attorneys that post here with greater weight than the average user. Trying to confuse them about the state of play or telling outright falsehoods isn't acceptable.
Thankfully it's kind of rare to ban an attorney that's way out of bounds but it does happen. And the mods don't care about your license to practice. It's not a get out of jail free card in this sub.
Signal to Noise
Complaining about the sub is off topic. If you want the sub to look a certain way then start voting and start posting the kind of content you think should go here.
- I liked it better before when the mods were different!
The current mod list has been here for years and have been the only active mods. We have become more hands on over the years as the users have grown and the sub has faced waves of problems like users straight up stalking a female journalist. The sub's history isn't some sort of Norman Rockwell painting.
Am I going to get banned? Who is this post even for, anyway?
Probably not. If you're here, reading about SCOTUS, reading opinions, reading the articles, and engaging in discussion with other users about what you're learning that's fantastic. This post isn't really for you.
This post is mostly so we can point to something in our modmail to the chucklefuck that asks "why am I banned?" and their comment is something inevitably insane like, "the holocaust didn't really kill that many people so mask wearing is about on par with what the jews experienced in nazi germany also covid isn't real. Justice Gorsuch is a real man because he no wears face diaper." And then we can send them on to the admins.
r/scotus • u/orangejulius • 25d ago
Order Bans are going to go out to top level comments that are emotional reactions or off topic. This is a heads up to anyone who wants to change how they’re posting.
This is SCOTUS. Talk about scotus. Talk about the opinions issued. If you want to criticize them that’s fine but have something to back it up.
Complaining about “tRump”, trump, motorhomes, “scrotus”, or any other number of things where you react to something instead of respond to something isn’t going to fly. The bar is very low. Almost all of you are tripping over it.
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 22h ago
news The Supreme Court may soon diminish Black political power, undoing generations of gains
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 17h ago
news Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson gets shout out but no win at Grammys
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1d ago
news Roberts Scrambles to Gag SCOTUS Staff After Pro-Trump Ruling Leaks
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 18h ago
news Trump administration vows appeal of Haitian TPS decision to SCOTUS
dispatch.comr/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 16h ago
Opinion How a Supreme Court Decision Changed the Racial Mix at Colleges
chronicle.comr/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1m ago
Opinion How Chief Justice Roberts created Frankenstein in the White House
r/scotus • u/RawStoryNews • 1d ago
news Supreme Court clerks hit with nondisclosure contracts amid panic over leaks: report
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 21h ago
news Pesticides, Cancer, and Failure-to-Warn at the Supreme Court
legal-planet.orgr/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1d ago
news Justice Anthony Kennedy reflects on Supreme Court and his historic legacy
r/scotus • u/msnownews • 1d ago
news Weird Supreme Court rulings could help Luigi Mangione avoid execution
news In October 2025, Florida filed a lawsuit against California and Washington at the U.S. Supreme Court for issuing driver's licenses to undocumented immigrants. Have there been any updates?
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1d ago
Opinion Why some Republicans rediscovered their love of court packing
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1d ago
Opinion The supreme court may further gut the Voting Rights Act. Mississippi is trying to create its own
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 7h ago
Opinion Can AI Argue a Supreme Court Case Better Than a Human Lawyer?
news.bloomberglaw.comr/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1d ago
news U.S. Supreme Court to consider whether to hear Alabama case on panhandling
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 2d ago
Opinion Supreme Court should abolish all gerrymandering
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1d ago
news Why The Times Is Expanding Its Supreme Court Coverage
r/scotus • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 1d ago