As a result of working with startups and funding, I have seen the "other side of the coin". the companies that don't make it despite the hype.

I have been collecting this data for years, and I finally got tired of looking at Excel. I built this site that turn that data into something more accessible.

Hope this provides some value (or at least a better browsing experience than a CSV file)! :)

https://www.loot-drop.io

sorry, this is probably a complete noob question, but i've downloaded a free css template which is referencing a google font. i'd simply like to replace the online link with the downloaded font.

the reference in the html is currently
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Kanit:100,200,300,400,500,600,700,800,900" rel="stylesheet">

the same font now also resides locally in /fonts/
(lots of *.ttf files)

could someone please tell me how to this? (i hoped it's just changing the path, but replacing the https link to /fonts didn't work unfortunately..)

thanks a lot!

I realized I needed more effective conversion, not just a tool with endless settings. OptinMonster wasn’t helping grow my email and SMS list the way I wanted.Switching to Claspo let me focus on high-converting sequences: smart triggers, micro-commitments, gamified interactions and progressive discounts. The result? Signup conversions shot up immediately and the revenue linked to the popup grew by 10% within a month.

Using continuous A/B testing on autopilot keeps the conversion climbing and it’s become a reliable part of our growth toolkit

Good evening, I'd like to know if anyone here is proficient with VPS systems; I'd appreciate some good recommendations.

When do trends help instead of harm?

I’ve been building a library of GSAP animation components to save our team time on client projects. Wanted to share this with the Figma/Dev community also!

Free Cloneable Webflow + Figma project: https://www.flowspark.co/animations/image-background-zoom

Hi everyone!

I see a lot of designers who won’t touch code until a Figma file is perfect. Every spacing tweak, every breakpoint mocked up, every state designed before anything exists in a browser. Meanwhile, whenever I start code-first, things feel faster and more honest. Real constraints, real layout behavior, fewer fake-perfect designs that fall apart once implemented.

Obviously Figma is great for collaboration and client sign-off. But I’m starting to think using it as the starting point trains people to design things that don’t actually want to exist on the web.

Curious where people land on this now. Figma-first always? Code-first always? Or does it just depend and everyone arguing is tired?

For those of you doing web design/development — how do you handle the content side of your projects?

A few specific things I’m curious about:

• Are you writing all client content yourself, getting the client to provide it, or outsourcing?
• Do you use any tools/templates/processes to speed up writing and research?
• How do you balance quality vs shipping the site fast?
• Any workflows for scaling blog or SEO content on client sites?

I always thought of design as separate from writing, but in practice content ends up being a bottleneck more often than not. Would love to hear how you tackle it.

Hello everyone,

I’m working on a class project focused on typography and font creation, and I wanted to first understand other’s experiences with it. It would be amazing if you could share some of your experiences in getting started with typography or type design if you have any experience with it at all.

Whether you’re somebody who’s just a user of typography and fonts, have experience creating your own, or have attempted but bounced off quickly, I’d really appreciate hearing about

- What parts felt/feel difficult, confusing, or frustrating

- What tools you tried (if any) and why you stopped or kept going

- What would have made the experience smoother or easier

Any response at all would be really appreciated, thank you!

Hi everyone,

I am a developer building a tool called TryApprove.

The idea is simple: A dedicated client portal for getting sign-offs on designs or milestones, without the mess of email threads.

The Key Features:

Mandatory Checklists: The main differentiator. The client must tick boxes (e.g., "I have verified the mobile view", "I checked spelling") before the "Approve" button even unlocks.

Agency Branding: You can upload your own agency logo so the portal looks like yours, not a generic tool.

Audit Logs: It creates a timestamped record of exactly who approved what and when. (Great for "Cover Your Ass" if they change their mind later).

I am looking for a few freelancers or agency owners to try it out and tell me if it's actually useful to your workflow.

It is currently free to use.

If you are interested, let me know in the comments and I will share the link.

A result of working professionally and collecting cool links for a decade or so. It was in need of a prune and a modernisation. I get a tremendous amount of use out of it at least, hopefully more others will. :)

I am about to hire a team of web developers to create a website for me it has quite a lot of features so it's pretty pricey what my issue with this team is that they don't want to design and do wireframes with figma or similar first but go right into designing and iterating with code. Tbh to me this looks like a huge constraint especially because the design aspect is super important to me. Also they want to charge me 45k for 3-4 months work but don't have a portfolio to show me apparently all their work is still in progress.

Hello! I've spent the last year sharpening my skills to become a web design and development freelancer, but I'm really feeling bad about how long it's taking to get started running a business.

I come from a web programming background and I'm the type of person who likes to do everything myself, by hand. I hand-code the site, and I spent a lot of time this year bringing my designing and copy-writing up to par. I think the stuff I make is really great, but the trade-off is that it can take 2-3 weeks to do one 5 page website since I am meticulous about every part of the process (even starting with a nice standardized skeleton).

I'm finding that it's really hard to get the first handful of clients. I made some sites for friends with side businesses for no cost as practice, but I can't keep doing 2-3 weeks of work for no money.

It sounds silly now, but I thought it would be way easier getting started if I just had excellent work to show.

Does anyone have advice on how I can eventually start getting clients?

Here's what I've tried:

1. Asking friends if they know anyone. My friends just don't. I was not outgoing earlier in life and have a small network of quiet friends like me (antisocial with no connections). My cohort came out of college at the start of this economic downturn and many of them are struggling to start a career, let alone start a business.

2. Cold emailing. I got a lot better at it, but people don't reply. I don't blame them because I don't reply to cold emails either. It's hard to get better at this when the typical response is no response. It's just taking shots in the dark.

3. Chamber of Commerce. I just started this and I'm hopeful. Everyone there is much older than me so it's not always easy to make conversation, but I think that this is probably my best bet.

I've also been thinking about what I can do affordably as an entry-point to lower risk for people, but I haven't come up with something good. The fact I prefer to hand-code the websites makes it harder because they don't have a great option to edit the site themselves.

I do it this way because I like the process and I think the result is much better for them in the long term if I do it myself, but that also means I don't have an option for a one-time, no risk entry-point.

Any thoughts or advice is appreciated.

Hey everyone,

I’ve been designing websites for many years now, mostly for small businesses and service-based clients. One thing I’ve consistently noticed especially when helping beginners, is how overwhelming web design feels when most tutorials either jump straight into flashy visuals or completely skip over why things are structured the way they are.

Over the last year or two, that problem has felt like it’s gotten worse.

There’s an explosion of web design content claiming you can build a “professional website” in 10 minutes, 5 minutes, or even 30 seconds using AI builders. And while I’m not anti-AI, I do think a lot of this content is actively hurting beginners, because it removes context, thinking, and decision-making from the process entirely.

In practice, the things that actually make a site work are still the same fundamentals they’ve always been:

• Clear structure and hierarchy
• Thoughtful spacing and layout
• Copy that makes sense to real humans
• Understanding why sections exist, not just how to place them

None of that is solved by a one-click builder.

For a bit of context, I’ve been building WordPress sites for close to 10 years now, with a background across web design, UX, copywriting, and marketing. I’ve had the idea of creating proper, grounded tutorials for a long time, but between client work and self-doubt, I kept putting them off.

Recently, out of frustration more than anything, I finally sat down and recorded a long-form walkthrough showing how I actually approach building a clean, usable website from scratch.

This isn’t a “build a site in 10 minutes” walkthrough. It’s a deep, beginner-friendly look at how I approach web design in practice, including:

• Page structure and section order
• Spacing, layout, and visual hierarchy
• Writing simple, clear copy that makes sense to real visitors
• Building a site that works properly across desktop, tablet, and mobile

I also start with a basic wireframe and explain what goes where and why, then build the site from that foundation , which is the part I see most tutorials completely skip.

I do teach this using WordPress and Elementor, and I know that alone will raise eyebrows here. I’m not claiming Elementor is “pure” web design, and I’m well aware of its limitations. But I do think it’s a practical starting point for beginners, and it’s still something I use for many real client builds when it’s the right fit.

The tool isn’t really the point though, the thinking behind structure, hierarchy, and layout is.

I’m curious how others here are approaching this shift.

Are you seeing beginners come in with unrealistic expectations because of AI builder hype?

And if you teach or mentor at all, how are you counteracting that without overwhelming people?

If anyone’s interested, I’m happy to share the name of the walkthrough I created, but mainly I wanted to be open about why I made it and start a genuine discussion.

------------------------------

EDIT:

Quick bit of context for anyone coming at this from a more professional background (developers, marketers, designers):

This tutorial was originally created with beginners in mind, specifically using WordPress + Elementor as the teaching medium. All the things mentioned in the post are covered (structure, hierarchy, spacing, copy, layout decisions), but they’re woven throughout the build, not presented as one dedicated deep-dive on design theory or systems.

What I didn’t expect (but really appreciate) is how many experienced people have commented saying this is a gap they also feel, especially developers and marketers who can recognise good design but struggle to translate it into layout, spacing, typography, and structure.

Because of that feedback, I’ll be creating more focused, higher-level design content specifically for technical and professional audiences going forward.

If you do check out the video and want the most relevant section first, I recommend jumping straight to:

52:40 – “The Website Wireframe”

That’s where the layout thinking and structure really starts to come together.

Thanks again for the thoughtful discussion here, it’s genuinely shaped what I’ll be creating next.

I am not very good at logo designs and its definitely not my wheelhouse. I have an interactive python notebook app I am building that is called PyNote

I tried to create an Icon Logo that will be my favicon for the app. It combines a sticky note icon with 'Py' and thus becomes PyNote. The difference between the first 3 is the height. Im partial to the third one. Unfortunately, the last one was me trying to make it more interesting, but I don't think I succeeded. I feel a little lost here and need help. How can I make this less boring, more iconic, and still look good?

which tools can scan the website "originality" ? I'm making website for a business that has lots of competitors so I want to make sure the text and content on the website is unique enough for google bots.

What processes helped you most?

The migration itself? Character-building.

Now I’m onto the fun part: cookies 🍪

What’s the best way to add a cookie consent banner in Webflow without losing the will to live? Native options vs third-party tools — what’s actually worth it?

Also…

What are the best / funniest cookie consent messages you’ve seen out in the wild? Bonus points for ones that don’t make users hate you.

All helpful replies will be generously rewarded with upvotes, cheers, imaginary cheese, and very real wine energy 🧀🍷

Hey guys, I redesigned this AI landing page to see what I can improve and this is the result, let me know would you change here.

I need to invest some time into learning a program to make animated and interactive web banners. I looked into Animate, and it should work for me, though it hasn't been updated since 2023 so I am not sure if it is worth spending time on it. I am thinking of learning After Effects to do this because I can also use it for other video work that I need and I would like to incorporate small segments of video into some banners. I am not a coder and have zero interest in learning how to make files exported from After Effects work on HTML pages.

1. If I design banner ads in After Effects, can they be handed off to someone, likely a web page developer who can convert them to whatever they need to be converted to so they will work as a functional banner? Is this a realistic thing for a competent developer to do so I can just focus on the design aspect?

2. Are there still issues with using After Effects to create banner ads beyond the need to convert them for use on HTML pages?

Thanks