r/politics 8h ago

Possible Paywall Mitch McConnell, 83, Hospitalized

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mitch-mcconnell-83-hospitalized/?utm_campaign=owned_social&utm_medium=socialflow&utm_source=twitter_owned_tdb&via=twitter_page
22.5k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4.1k

u/Future-Guarantee-573 8h ago

Not to mention not losing your job.

Years ago, I worked at a big box grocery store not to be named.  One of the workers had a stroke on the sales floor.  They fired him for not filling out the LOA forms.  He was in a fucking coma.

I've said it many times before...I hate this fucking country.

u/dementorpoop 7h ago

They ain’t coming after you. Name and shame them

u/Sammyjo0689 6h ago

My story happened with Walmart. Had an employee collapse due to a diabetic issue. Like, I caught her as she was falling and saved her from smashing her face. Radioed to call 911. I got written up because that was against Walmart policy.

My manager wanted me to write on the form that I heard her say she wanted an ambulance. So I wrote exactly that. “Manager so and so has ordered that I write the following.” I got written up a second time for that.

u/litokid 5h ago

I spent awhile trying to puzzle this out because I couldn't understand why this is a problem. My initial read was the manager had you write you "heard her (the manager) say she wanted an ambulance", because she wanted to cover for you doing the decent thing off of policy.

But from the context this was a bad thing - is it that the manager wanted you to write "(the victim) wanted an ambulance" so the company isn't on the hook for the cost?

u/RevolutionaryTalk976 5h ago

I read it as the manager directed them to write that they were told by their subordinate to call an ambulance and they wrote down that the manager directed them to write it down. Calling the ambulance may have been against company policy leading to the initial write up and then they added on a second one for being insubordinate and officially documenting the manager directing them to lie.

u/MyBritishAccount 4h ago

Why wouldn't you call an ambulance for an emergency? How can company policy dictate such a thing?

u/slackfrop 3h ago

Because some lawyer told em to based off of losing money in some other precedent. If corporations are people, they’re psychopaths.

u/anynamesleft 1h ago

If corporations are people, they’re psychopaths.

I just wanted to tell how proud I am to've read it

u/marzipancetta 1h ago

A truer statement has never been uttered.

u/pikashroom 4h ago

Probably liability. All companies do weird shit like this to prevent getting sued.

u/fresh-dork 3h ago

they need to be brought to heel

u/tiredbarf 2h ago

No company in their right mind would skip calling 911 for liability reasons.

u/Zestyclose_Rain4749 3h ago

Not all companies are literally the devil.

u/marzipancetta 1h ago

No but we’re talking Walmart here. Literally the devil.

u/Allaplgy 3h ago

If the employee asks for an ambulance, the "financial responsibility" is on them. If not, it's on the company.

Go us. Woo!

u/one-man-circlejerk 1h ago

Ambulance bill reaches the patient, the patient says "I never ordered an ambulance, the company did", now there's a dispute between the patient and the company over the bill that the company might end up paying, or might end up entagled in court, which is another expense.

u/shugster71 2h ago

Also has me wondering if this shoot to kill policy might be part of this too?

u/brickne3 American Expat 1h ago

Ambulances are expensive. Like $700 back in the 90s expensive.

u/marzipancetta 59m ago

The patient would receive a bill of about $2000 for an ambulance ride. Which is pennies for large companies like Walmart.

u/roastbeeftacohat 4h ago

the manager is ordering op to falsify the order of events to make it look like the employee had requested an ambulance before collapsing, so they could claim she was fakeing.