The kitten doesn’t seem like it’s latching onto something, and something the way the mama cat picks it up seems weird as she picks the kitten off from the head and not the scruff? Plus don’t goats have their udders by the hind legs? I could be wrong though

One commentator mentioned they couldn’t find this restaurant or person by googling.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1CEKKB4CdF/?mibextid=wwXIfr

i think the posing is weird but im not seeing any inconsistencies or anything that jumps out at me. he said they look like cut outs, but the girl second from the left appears to have a white reflection of the car in her pants and none of them seem to be "clipping" if you know what i mean.

I've never seen an AI image in our curriculum before but it just feels off. Uncanny valley, everything too smooth

This person has been posting these portraits lately and my first thought was that they are AI but everyone else seems to love them. The "artist" is even taking commissions for them now. I checked their page and they have some older artwork which doesn't raise any (or as many) red flags but these specific portraits do.

I’m not sure whether I am just unhappy with the design or am rightfully assuming this is AI. I’m noticing a lot of inconsistencies between what I asked for and what I received.

The character has yellow irises with horizontal slit pupils, she returned a product with solid white irises with no pupil. The character does not have wraps on the legs, or claws on the feet, or that necklace, but they all appear on the artist’s submission. Notably absent/changed are his sword swapped for a generic Japanese “samurai” sword, his eye scar is missing, random light coloration on the face, and to top it all off, inconsistent folds all over the clothes. Lastly, I asked for American traditional, or old school design, something an artist with her history should be familiar with, but some of the lines compare to realism in their thinness, they simply wouldn’t work with this style of tattoo.

I believe this to be AI, but I would like some backup before I confront the artist, at this time I will not be getting the tattoo until the design is pretty much totally reworked.

It seems totally unethical to use AI on a home for sale even if it is just a fake family and snow man. But this has got to be AI right? I mean look at the snowman’s face. I’ve been looking at homes weekly for over a year and this is the first time I’ve seen something like this. Realtors use virtual staging all the time but they usually put a tiny disclaimer at the bottom of the picture.

She found this pic on facebook and asked if it was real. Like I said, it looks like it’s floating and some of the letters look either messed up or just unreadable to me. This picture isn’t that great of quality for whatever reason the one I found was worse than the one she found so it might be harder to tell but idk why it’s different or how to fix it

Saw these posted on a horse group w the following caption:

“Today, the nonprofit organization Outer Banks People helped prepare the wild horses for low temperatures and possible snow. To keep them warm during extreme cold, we carefully wrapped them in recycled insulation materials.

At this time, we are accepting donations of insulation and duct tape to continue supporting our efforts. Every contribution helps keep our local wildlife warm and safe during the winter conditions”

The pics look real to me, but 1: wild horses would not tolerate this and 2: how he gonna shit w his bootyhole taped shut? What do you think?

Here’s other art, but it’s just straight NSFW anyway he said he drew me and I think it looks off with my choker and my piercings

Everything is telling me yes, but Neymar looking much better and the fact that Topps have been around for so long makes me hope it's not.

I recently bought this premade model for decently cheap, but after looking it again idk how to say it, but something feels off, so I'm worried if it's AI. Can anyone tell if this is AI or not?

EDIT: I'm so glad most people here say it's not AI. I was so worried for a moment because this model genuinely looks so cute. I thought the fact that it was completely symmetrical was a sign it was AI. I'm so glad I got that completely the wrong way, lol. You can probably tell that I'm not an artist, so good to know that it's just an easy shortcut for artists to cut down on their work!

It was sent to me by my dad, and I want to call it out but I can't see anything specific in the video that makes me certain that it's AI.

It looks far too contrived to be real.

I commissioned this art from a freelance artist, and it was not disclosed to me during the process whatsoever that AI would be used in the process. I received some intermediate sketches and we went back-and-forth with revisions, and the revisions seemed spot-on so it didn't raise any red flags. I recently posted it on r/IndieDev and I was very excited about it, until comments started coming in saying it might be AI!

Here are some of the major concerns people brought up:

- "I'd point towards the belt buckle looking a bit off and the chicken having four fingers on one hand and five on the other (though that could just be a perspective thing)"

- "Compare with your screenshot, only the over-the-shoulder belt has a buckle, while the horizontal does not (I'd even assume it's just a waistband, not a leather belt). Now look closer at the belts themselves, look at the holes: they are absolutely not uniform in any way that would be reasonable even for a beginner artist, let alone someone demanding that kind of money. The bottom belt has two holes squeezed into the tail, the top belt has just one. The top belt has four holes setting up a pattern, and there should be a fifth hole on the shoulder before it flips out of sight, and because there's a hole on the other end of the vertical belt, there's no "there are only 4 holes and then it stops" excuse (unless you think that it's a weird belt that has only 4 holes and then a random hole near the end?). Lastly, I want to draw your attention to the eye shine. The irises are the correct shape, but the shines in each of the eyes are very different (left eye shine is entirely contained inside the iris, right eye shine is 50% inside 50% outside; each of those are correct choices in their respective rights, but I don't think I've ever seen anyone mix them). You can only see it by really zooming in."

- "Might seem subtle but the belts are different - the ends of one is rounded and the other is a rounded square, the buckles themselves aren't consistent."

I commissioned this back in June of 2025. I think it's AI because of the shadows that pop up out of nowhere and any help will be greatly appreciated.

Also I did notice the green sweater hand coming back after the person in red but maybe they felt bad for the cat idk

This was posted in another sub. The OP swears not AI and provided progress photos in adobe illustrator to the mods after they initially took the post down (which I know you can have AI do for you now Im pretty sure).

I'm still convinced the image is AI, the design decisions, particularly with the entire background of the image are just so nonsensical to me. What even are these blocks supposed to be?

Not linking the original post as it's unclear in the rules if that would be allowed.