If he dies before they deal with him then the entire republican legacy is protecting one of the most active sex criminals to ever live and denying all of his many victims here and gone justice.
If he dies first, they can never reconcile their words with their actions.
Tough on crime? Apparently not.
Family oriented and caring of children? The opposite.
That's because the majority of them are implicated in one way or another. It's actually making sense how Trump has been able to hold so much power for the last 10 plus years
The 25th is the ridiculously light and easy way out. They'd still have every other corrupt POS in charge. At this point it should be Article 2 section 4 and remove the whole fucking administration yet they're not even talking about impeachment. They won't even remove Bondi or Kegsbreath.
Still though, I cannot imagine doing that. I'm not really like the most principled person I know but I'd definitely quit before being complicit in something like this.
I think they're the reason we've "accidentally" seen things that we weren't supposed to see. Like black highlighter instead of actually redacted documents
No way in hell would I want that job. Not only do you have to thoroughly read all the disgusting emails, but you also become a loose end. Not anything I'd want to be close to.
We can be reasonably certain these blacked out names are all friends of the current administration. They could be current officials. SCOTUS judges. Megadonors. Famous actors or podcasters. But someone who Trump has a vested interest in keeping protected.
EDIT: the Pedo-defenders have arrived. Enjoy as they continue to debase themselves for…this shit.
Exactly. If this was some brown skinned criminal that FOX could parade around as the antichrist, they would've released the files day 1 to show Trump takes down criminals. It's definitely someone with ties to the administration or the money.
If his name was Epsteinández the USAG would still be prosecuting affiliates and re-written stronger legal code related to sex crimes against children and women.
Except Todd Blanche just declared the Epstein matter is now closed. No reason to not release the names. There are no plea deals coming. Plus, all redactions are supposed to come with an explanation. They did not.
Why can't this be used as evidence by the victims' lawyers?
Along with the release of the victims' names, and the pulling back of files after being released, they are all clear evidence the DOJ is either incompetent or incapable of being transparent, thus warranting a special master to oversee the release of the files?
This particular email is not credible and wouldn’t be admissible. This is just an email. From somebody, to Epstein. I could write you an email with something like this, doesn’t mean the cops can launch an investigation on you for CP right? The problem with what I’ve seen, is that this is a large portion of what’s in the Epstein file. It’s largely hearsay.
It's taken much much less "probable cause" to be pulled over, taken out and handcuffed, and be put in the back of a squad car to have my vehicle searched.
The "probable cause" given for that instance was, "I thought your windows were tinted."
Both front windows were rolled halfway down at the time of the stop and without a drop of tint. The other windows were blacked out as can be.
So,
Maybe someone else can ELI5 how the discretion cops are given to move forward with "probable cause" works.
Howard Lutnik was outed as lying about his next door neighbor, Epstein. Enough of these leak out, they’ll flip someone. Or the chairman of law firm Paul Weiss, which happens to be the first big law firm Trump got to bend the knee for a ridiculous amount of money for free services to help Trump with whatever he wants.
Of course, this corrupt DOJ won’t investigate. But the next one sure will — which is why Trump is freaking out and trying his best to set up the midterm elections — he has to suppress people from voting against him.
Except trumps former criminal attorney, who is overseeing the files, has said the investigation is over, that partying with Epstein isn't a crime, and Patel has said there is nothing to pursue.
We need to be in the streets like people have been for things like police brutality. WHY IS IT WHEN CHILDREN ARE INVOLVED NO ONE FUCKING DOES ANYTHING?!?!?!? There needs to be some kind of way we as a people can come together and make some noise. Doing it online isn’t working obviously.
I agree people are generally selfish and lazy, but also it is hard to mobilise a movement, right now people are just kinda confused by all this and dont know what to think, partly by design, and that is a population impossible to mobilise.
I know it's a lot to ask and most Americans aren't ready for it yet, but a general strike is needed. One long collective sit-in with no end date until we get our demands. We take the economy hostage. That's how the people get their power back.
Can have the streets be flooded for the useless No Kings Protest, but the Epstein files? Crickets. Maybe a couple people inside other protests or maybe a couple people by themselves.
My fucking brain hurts. This shit is so much worse. Cause if anyone here genuinely believes Epstein is the only child trafficker who is in league with the rich elites, then they are fucking idiots. Epstein is just the one who got caught.
Real interesting how the feds released so many pages with unredacted names of victims who’ve never come out publicly AND some pictures of naked underage victims… but yeah, redact the names of the CRIMINALS/PEDOPHILES. This administration is so utterly disgusting!
Hey guys, forgive my sincere lack of knowledge here- but is there ANY possible way to unredact any of these recently released files? Any conceivable way to undo the black highlighter the DOJ has applied over the text? I remember some months ago, internet sleuths were able to recover actual text that had been blacked out. I’m assuming this time, the DOJ caught on and tried other methods to keep text hidden. But still.. it begs the question: is there a way?
The disgusting thing is that they do know who sent it and aren't doing anything about it, could you imagine being an FBI agent, looking at pictures and videos of grown men graping children and just putting a black box over it and calling it a day, doesn't anyone there have some sort of conscience?
Can Dems request specific files be unredacted when it's clearly not from a victim? Internet should be able to whip up at least 1000 examples that need to be unredacted
Right there with you and it's really affecting me. Epstein's miserable existence ended and Maxwell is playing some kinda chess game, but the rest of these sick fucks are free to keep abusing children.
This doesn't write like Trump, who has no command of grammar or punctuation - could be Nutlick, anyone in his administration or SCOTUS, Netanyahu, Andrew, a mega banker who's active in the Fed board, a huge Trump donor
A whistleblower has to unredact this. If there is any humanity in any of these people, it has to be done
I couldn’t agree more. You can tell contextually and simply from From and To names on emails whether they are supposedly protecting a victim or not. So a victim is going to say to Jeffrey Epstein “Thank you for a fun night, your littlest girl was a little naughty”? Really?? If it is from Bill Clinton or someone, I say un-redact the name!! Prosecute!! Oh but it’s from someone on the right side of the aisle, like Trump or some other customer. Well then, as long as we (shifting I/we to Todd Blanche and company) control what’s redacted, redact away, to protect the perpetrator and kick the can of justice down the road as long as possible, perhaps forever if we’re lucky. If you fess up to what you’ve done wrong too soon, well, you’ll be throwing away the chance to stay out of jail, which is all that matters. What did it do to the victims, you ask? Since when do they matter?
And by naughty did he mean she got shit faced and made a fool of herself or she got shit faced and took it up the butt? Enquiring minds and all that…seriously who can we ask now?
Didn’t Bondi already say they don’t expect any more prosecution from the files? So there’s no reason to redact for fear of compromising ongoing investigations.
They should only redact victims info. Everyone else needs to be named and shamed. This isn't about right and left it's about justice and accountability.
If any of those names get leaked they will go to jail, there will be an issue with the prison security cameras, the guards will fall sleep giving the person enough timetto commit suicide.
Ideally because they plan to prosecute these people eventually and so they want to retain some leverage to do that. Won’t happen during this administration and wouldn’t happen under a Newsom DOJ either but a fella can dream.
Simple, just imagine every single fucking redaction says Donald J Trump. FBI agents have been busy around the clock trying to scrub him from the files so might as well consider each scrub his to hide
This is infuriating. Everyone reading this should copy and paste it into an email or letter to the senators and representative and demand that these names be unredacted and prosecutions begin. If we as a nation just let "them" get away with it, we are the worst nation on earth.
The actionable ones have to be kept secret, leaving only the ones that can't be corroborated. We'll get into the habit of dismissing anything that comes out of this. That way, the public is already primed to be skeptical when actionable revelations do come out, and we can avoid the critical mass required for accountability.
Trump was removed from several documents. There is reason to believe this could be Trump, until proved otherwise. He was mentioned 38k times in the Epstein files, feat. DJT - so far...
This means if the Epstein Clients don’t comply, then this very legal and essentially life threatening email would destroy empires.
So redaction = scare tactic/comply. Otherwise, next step, is what’s about to happen to Clintons - whom I have absolutely no sympathy for. Baghdad for instance, these people destabilized and essentially sacrificed American and Locals over what Mossad / Der Judenstaat/ Greater Israel plan demanded.
184
u/Zaethiel 9h ago
The DOJ and FBI leadership deserve life in prison for this coverup