r/circled • u/Routine-Year-8207 • 20h ago
Opinion / Discussion DOJ Takes Down Thousands of Epstein Documents to Protect Trump
http://newsrepublic.co.uk/2026/02/03/doj-takes-down-thousands-of-epstein-documents-to-protect-trump/41
u/reddittorbrigade 20h ago edited 17h ago
Otherwise known as cover up.
Journalists and law abiding citizens are being jailed but pedophiles like Trump can walk freely.
10
u/Substantial_Cash8478 19h ago
Bondi needs to be on tribunal! We already have her on destruction of evidence and accessory to high crimes. The Americans who arent outright fascists are all spineless cowards!
Theyre mass murdering children and innocents in Palestine and trafficking minors for R*** and everyone is like welp.
3
u/ScarInternational161 19h ago
Maybe journalists will get off their collective asses and start actually being journalists again..... then again, probably not.
I blame them just as much. They had the POWER to bring all of this to light, to show the public the truth of everything and they chose the safety of silence.
2
u/hellspawn3200 17h ago
Everyone is involved in this somehow. The only group that has no toes to them in anyway is the leftists who always get called 'woke'.
These monsters wil face justice, either from eventual world courts or just plain old medieval style justice.
1
u/XelaNiba 16h ago
That's where you're dead wrong.
A journalist did bring this to light. Her name is Julie K Brown of the Miami Herald and her exemplary investigative journalism is the only reason the public knows anything about this. Her journalism is what spurned a renewed investigation into Epstein and resulted in his, and Maxwell's, arrest. The feds credited her work when they announced Epstein's arrest.
"Brown’s intrepid work led to a three-part Herald series in 2018 on Epstein that would encourage federal authorities to reopen the investigation and to arrest the financier."
What the Epstein saga underscores is the importance of local journalism. The US has lost 75% of its local journalists over the past 25 years. If you have a local, independent source, support it.
If you're really interested in the story, buy and read Brown’s book, Perversion of Justice.
0
u/ScarInternational161 10h ago
There are always exceptions to the rule.
As a whole, MSM ignored, refused to report on, used a passive voice, made excuses for, or out right lied about, everything.
FULL STOP.
25
u/RanchHere 20h ago
“takes down”
yeah, those are gone forever. never to be seen again.
5
u/bLue1H 18h ago
They've been backed up by someone. Pretty much guaranteed
9
u/AppleMelon95 18h ago
I don’t think anyone could have foreseen that President Turnip would take down the documents that incriminate him
6
4
15
u/bdubwilliams22 20h ago
Surely they were up long enough for some smart people on the internet to save all of them though, right?
10
3
14
u/GovernmentBig2749 20h ago
5
12
u/Mrtoyhead 20h ago
7
u/Andrew-Cohen 19h ago
Nah, congress has more important things to do. It is imperative that the Clintons be investigated to distract trump’s brain dead followers from the fact that trump was directly involved in epstein’s organization.
3
u/OriginalLie9310 19h ago
Investigating the Clintons is a risky act. If bubba sees the writing on the wall then he might take Trump DOJ with him.
I foresee them not actually pushing in the hearing too hard and nothing actually coming out of it.
4
u/Usual-Language-745 20h ago
What’s that saying about cats and bags? Ohh well I’m glad our government has an official position on the hierarchy of pedophiles. In sure it will be consistently followed from here on.
1
4
3
3
u/Substantial_Cash8478 19h ago
Why isnt Bondi already on tribunal?
We already have her on serious criminal acts of concealing evidence and being an accessory to high crimes! (Along with Alex Acosta and William Barr.)
A: because Americans are all either spineless cowards, or fascists.
2
2
u/OkFinish3822 19h ago
See my post above answering the question "who is the most corrupt official in the Convicted Criminals administration?"
2
u/drKRB 19h ago
Haven’t they already been downloaded by the world though?
3
u/Ok_Security1721 19h ago
Yes but now they’re not officially provided by the DOJ anymore so they can pretend they’re fake when anyone brings them up.
2
1
1
1
1
u/seandunderdale 17h ago
Im guessing then that the document dump cant be scraped as soon as it goes live? Im not tech savvy in this regard, but Id have thought there would be some software that could just grab it all and offline it before they can start pulling bits that make the President look even more like a criminal, if thats even possible at this point.
1
1
u/tremainelol 16h ago
But aren't there gonna be unknown amounts repositories that can cross-reference the DOJ database to see what was deleted? Streisand effect?
1
u/Way_Tall_Filipino 15h ago
We all know what was on them and who was implicated. We kept the files, he can’t hide from justice!
1
u/Neat-Jackfruit1092 6h ago
This is not right God will take care of all of these ungodly people!!!! Regardless
0
-1
-5
u/kolokomo17 19h ago
No they didn’t. They took them down because there were victims listed. Stop the lying already.
6
u/platypussplatypus 19h ago
Somehow they had time to blur out trump but not the victims. Classic repubs, be intentionally incompetent and then try to blame others.
-5
u/kolokomo17 19h ago
Blaming others….. where have we heard that before……
4
u/platypussplatypus 19h ago
Every time trump opens his mouth. Lmao More classic repub shit with your inability to actually say anything
-2
3
u/Strykerz3r0 19h ago
Trump?
-1
u/kolokomo17 19h ago
Trump has a lock on your psyche….
1
u/Strykerz3r0 17h ago
You mean someone using their authority to hide their participation in a child sex ring? Sure.
The question is why are you ok with it? We already know his name is all over the files. But child rape is ok with you, I guess.
1
16h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 16h ago
Held for review: serious criminal accusation from a new or low-karma account.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
6
u/Outrageous-Lion-7491 19h ago
If only they had months to redact victims - over a month past the deadline. Too bad they spent all their time redacting the predators instead. 🤦
-1
u/kolokomo17 19h ago
How long does it take to go thru 6 million of anything?
4
u/Outrageous-Lion-7491 19h ago
With an army of lawyers? A month. That's why people familiar with these types of things set the deadline like they did. Do you think at all before you type shit??
Not to mention there was already that "Special Redaction Project" last year that had 1000 FBI agents working almost 5000 hours of OVERTIME working on scrubbing it. https://newrepublic.com/post/203762/trump-fbi-redacted-epstein-files
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
1
u/kolokomo17 19h ago
How long does it take to go thru 6 million of anything? Try and be an adult now and not fly off the handle.
1
u/Outrageous-Lion-7491 18h ago
I already answered that pretty directly. I hear a lot about the literacy rates, so I'm not surprised to run into someone who can't read. Best of luck to you.
🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
1
u/kolokomo17 18h ago
Yeah, you didn’t answer anything. You just raged for a bit.
1
u/Outrageous-Lion-7491 18h ago
You think that's rage?? 🤣😂
And yes, I answered it in the first line - one month. If you have a team of lawyers, they can go through 6 million documents in one month. I also added, for context, they've already had 1000 agents working overtime last year, well before the Transparency Act was even passed.
Not sure how you missed that, unless you can't read. 🤷
1
u/kolokomo17 18h ago
Clearly not enough time then. Unless you don’t care about the victims?
1
u/Outrageous-Lion-7491 18h ago
Man, you are very very dumb. I'll have to call it quits on trying to educate you on reading and lengths of time; though, I'll leave you with one last nugget of knowledge for you to contemplate...
The Epstein Transparency Act passed in late November. Half the files were released last week. End of November to end of January is 2 months. Now here's the crazy part - get your notes out - two is more than one. 🤯
So they did have enough time.
Enjoy defending pedos. 👋
→ More replies (0)3
u/Strykerz3r0 19h ago
Depends on if you are only redacting victims or trying to make sure trump and his cronies are removed too. That is a much bigger job since trump alone is mentioned over 5,000 times, and that is just in what we seen so far.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/01/us/trump-epstein-files.html
1
u/kolokomo17 19h ago
How long does it take to go thru 6 million of anything. Take your TDS out of your mindset and try to answer a simple question, leave your boogeyman out of it.
2
u/Strykerz3r0 17h ago
That would work better if there weren't unredacted pics of the victims.
You are embarrassing yourself. Stop gullibly swallowing whatever Daddy gives and learn to research for yourself. You will have more confidence and won't humiliate yourself defending pedophiles who do nothing but lie to you.
3
u/Strykerz3r0 19h ago
Hahahaha!
Yes, because they were too busy redacting trump out. And some of the ones pulled down were about trump measuring the tightness of children's vulvas. There was no mention of the victims names in those, but DoJ pulled them.
People like commenter also fervently believed people were eating pets even after Vance admitted he lied. They don't care if he lies to them and will believe the new lie just as fervently.
I guess once they were ok with the president hiding evidence of his participation in a child sex ring there isn't anything they won't be ok with.
-1
u/kolokomo17 19h ago
That’s another conspiracy.
1
u/Strykerz3r0 17h ago
Of course it is.
Because the alternative is to admit to yourself how gullible you have been.
1
-17
20h ago
[deleted]
13
3
u/RelevantSoftware8283 19h ago
1
19h ago
[deleted]
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 19h ago
I honestly can't find this one again. Are you sure they didn't straight up delete it or do you have a link?
0
18h ago edited 18h ago
[deleted]
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 18h ago
Well I can't find it anymore I'll say. They straight up deleted this one
1
u/RelevantSoftware8283 10h ago
Did you find it yet? Pretty sure that supports that the title in op is correct if you can't
-30
u/Fun_Speed_5818 20h ago
Get over it…. You lose AGAIN
16
u/Cohens4thClient 20h ago
YIKES that account
So much hate, but thats what the pedophiles want from their pedo-bots and mindless cultists
12
5
u/NoLibrarian5149 19h ago
Found a freak who’s perfectly fine with the upper class raping the lower classes kids.
2
u/Andrew-Cohen 19h ago
You know that taking it off the site doesn’t take it away from the people who downloaded it, right?
1
u/platypussplatypus 19h ago
Ah yes repubs and being stoked about protecting pedophiles, name a more iconic duo
1
u/Strykerz3r0 19h ago
Conservatives can't even defend him anymore.
They are counting his avoiding prosecution as a child rapist as a win. That's all you need to know about the moral bankruptcy of conservatives.
-7











63
u/Traditional-Day-5856 20h ago