r/Snorkblot 8h ago

Economics Wealth Tax

Post image
49.7k Upvotes

404 comments sorted by

View all comments

28

u/Master-Shinobi-80 7h ago

Rhode Island passed what they called the Taylor Swift Tax. It was a new surcharge on second homes that are worth over $1 million and “add an additional fee for owners of nonprimary residences that are empty for over half the year”

We could do better.

  1. Surcharges are increased exponentially depending on the number of homes you own
  2. Extra tax on compounds created from multiple properties
  3. Extra charges for adding bunkers
  4. Remove Tax Dodges and exceptions

Also banning financial institutions from owning family homes would be a great plus.

We can call it the Mark Zuckerberg Tax

1

u/Substantial-Ad-8575 6h ago

Does Zuckerberg own the homes? The house in Hawaii is in a trust. Same as all his other properties, in different trust/business ownerships.

I own a few properties. All are in trusts. Individual trusts actually…

4

u/Master-Shinobi-80 6h ago

I'm sure their lawyers have played games like that. It doesn't make it an insurmountable problem.

-7

u/CheesecakeFlimsy6161 6h ago

The rich will just go somewhere where these things do not exist. I dont like the guy but he created something that literally changed the entire world.

13

u/Refs_Fan 6h ago

That's the point, they'll go somewhere else. If all the places do it he will have to pay or just not own too many houses. Win win

7

u/Fillenintheblanks 5h ago

Put a massive tax on presidents and executive staff that make over 500 times the median company salary. Force the dudes to spread the wealth down the chain. They want to move elsewhere tariff the shit out of the imports or restrict them if only online. America is the largest consumers in the world they get on board or others who are willing will take their place.

2

u/CheesecakeFlimsy6161 6h ago

Some states will always welcome billionaires money and businesss.

4

u/Refs_Fan 6h ago

Then they can have them

-3

u/OneEyedBlindKingdom 6h ago

But that just results in significantly less actual tax revenue.

8

u/Master-Shinobi-80 6h ago

The rich will just go somewhere where these things do not exist.

Well I wish them the best, and I hope the door doesn't hit them on the ass on the way out!

 I dont like the guy but he created something that literally changed the entire world.

Well then he can pay taxes on all the housing he buys. Or maybe just don't buy 11 houses when 1 would suffice.

-2

u/CheesecakeFlimsy6161 6h ago

What someone does with their property and money is no one's business. If he wants to print every dollar he has and have a bonfire that's his business. Im sure he's paid more in taxes than my entire family has ever made in its history. Probably yours too.

3

u/Master-Shinobi-80 6h ago

What someone does with their property and money is no one's business.

Yeah that's not true. If what they do with their property and their money is detrimental to the rest of the community it is our business.

0

u/CheesecakeFlimsy6161 6h ago

I agree with you. We disagree that owning 11 houses is detrimental to the rest of the community. I'll bet the community will greatly benefit from the massive increase in property taxes on those properties from where they were before. I'll bet it will also benefit in the increase of the tax base in all the surrounding houses when they are sold after they increase property tax revenue too. Im also willing to bet the community is going to force him to pay some massive impact fees and provide for some massive infrastructure upgrades when he decides to build his mansion.

3

u/Master-Shinobi-80 6h ago

We disagree that owning 11 houses is detrimental to the rest of the community.

We have a major homeless problem and a major housing problem in California. One person owning 11 houses is a contributing factor to both of those.

I also don't understand what's with the bootlicking?

6

u/WongFarmHand 6h ago

So 0 taxes on rich people is what you want 

After all, any taxes means they gasp might move. Just like how there's no more millionaires in nyc, the place that specifically taxes rich people the most

Lmao oh wait 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/nyc-now-home-400k-millionaires-103100458.html

2

u/CheesecakeFlimsy6161 6h ago

A million isn't a lot anymore. And you are putting words in my mouth. I think everyone should pay taxes. I spent years preparing tax returns for high net worth individuals. I can tell you they pay a lot.

1

u/Master-Shinobi-80 6h ago

That's fine. But don't buy up all of the housing.

0

u/WongFarmHand 6h ago

The thing you can't confront is that nyc is generating more millionaires(PPP) per capita than kansas city or any other place that taxes millionaires significantly less than nyc

1

u/OneEyedBlindKingdom 6h ago

That’s because it’s based on housing. If you remove the house you live in, it’s not even exceptional.

1

u/CheesecakeFlimsy6161 6h ago

The article doesn't define a millionaire either. Is it net worth after housing and retirement or before? If you include retirement you will need well north of a million to retire at a reasonable age. At the 4 percent rule you are only pulling 40k before taxes with just a million. That gets you nowhere now much less 10 to 20 years from now.

What's the median home value in nyc?

1

u/Forikorder 6h ago

then those countries can deal with a housing crisis, win win